Drilling comparison in ‘warm ice’ and drill design comparison

Title Drilling comparison in ‘warm ice’ and drill design comparison
Publication Type
Journal Article
Year
2007
Author(s) Laurent Augustin , Hideaki Motoyama, Frank Wilhelms, Sigfús J Johnsen, Steffen B Hansen, Pavel Talalay, Nikolay I Vasiliev
Journal/ Publication
Annals of Glaciology
Volume
47
Pagination
73-78
Abstract

For the deep ice-core drilling community, the 2005/06 Antarctic season was an exciting and fruitful one. In three different Antarctic locations, Dome Fuji, EPICA DML and Vostok, deep drillings approached bedrock (the ice-water interface in the case of Vostok), emulating what had previously been achieved at NorthGRIP, Greenland, (summer 2003 and 2004) and at EPICA Dome C2, Antarctica (season 2004/05). For the first time in ice-core drilling history, three different types of drill (KEMS, JARE and EPICA) simultaneously reached the depth of 'warm ice' under high pressure. After excellent progress at each site, the drilling rate dropped and the drilling teams had to deal with refrozen ice on cutters and drill heads. Drills have different limits and perform differently. In this comparative study, we examine depth, pressure, temperature, pump flow and cutting speed. Finally, we compare a few parameters of ten different deep drills.

DOI
10.3189/172756407786857820
URL
Special Collections International Workshop on Ice Drilling Technology Series, 6th International Workshop on Ice Drilling Technology
Categories Deep Drilling, Warm Ice
Equipment EPICA/NGRIP Drill, JARE drills, KEMS / TELGA / TBZS drills
Citation Laurent Augustin , Hideaki Motoyama, Frank Wilhelms, Sigfús J Johnsen, Steffen B Hansen, Pavel Talalay, Nikolay I Vasiliev ( 2007 ) Drilling comparison in ‘warm ice’ and drill design comparison. Annals of Glaciology , 47 , 73-78 . doi: 10.3189/172756407786857820
Lead Author
Laurent Augustin